Punk-Ass Bleeders....

Below is a sample of the childish, purile, illogical and obviously mindless criticism to be found on many "lefty" blogs:


"Four More Years of War on Evildoers? No Thanks, Freddie!
Filed under General, George W. Bush, War and Peace, Election 2008, Republicans, 2008 Reasons, Fred Thompson by jclifford at 6:49 pm
We’ve had almost seven years now of a President whose vision of foreign policy is to declare that he’s going to defeat “evildoers”. It’s a silly attitude, but the consequences of it have be gravely serious.

One would hope that the Republican presidential candidates of 2008 have learned the lesson from George W. Bush’s childish declaration of a war against evil. Unfortunately, it seems that, at least for some, the lesson has not been learned.

Almost as soon as he announced the formation of his presidential campaign exploratory committee, Fred Thompson followed in George W. Bush’s rhetorical footsteps. Thompson declared, of the military occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, “This is a battle between the forces of civilization and the forces of evil and we’ve got to choose sides!”

Oh really? It’s a battle against the forces of evil? So, then, will we be bombing the corrupt government of Pakistan? Will we be throwing bank robbers into the gulags of Guantanamo? Will people be placed on no-fly lists when they’re caught being really mean to other people?

A vote for Fred Thompson is a vote for four more years of sending the American military around the world on quixotic quests to rid the world of evil. In 2008, America needs a more mature option."

The blogger who wrote the crap noted above needs to learn that "kitchen sink" tactics don't win arguments or make valid points, but merely obscure facts with disinformation and what looks a lot to me like conjuring tricks: "look over there!" he says as he points right, while sneaking a smack on the ass from the left. So far, "Irregular Times" is my favorite "blog-o-idocy." If you need to raed more of the above, by all means check out the IT blog.

Who's Into FDT? ME! (language warning)

Got this vicariously from Blonde Sagacity: http://www.acidlogic.com/im_fredthompson.htm
(link above to entire article - following is edited)


Fred Dalton Thompson is an attorney. Fred Dalton Thompson is an actor. Fred Dalton Thompson is a former Senator. Fred Dalton Thompson is a big mean redneck. A really big mean redneck - How else do you think he could get away with being an attorney, an actor, and a Senator without getting tied up in a sack and thrown into the sea? The only thing worse than an attorney is an actor and the only thing worse than an actor is a Senator. Everybody knows the old Shakespeare line "First we kill all the lawyers" but how many people know that in Shakespeare's original draft the line was "First we kill all the lawyers and then we beat the piss out of all the actors and then we feed all the Senators to the pigs and send all the pigs to the moon"? Everybody knows that lawyers are the most hated people in America but it will be just two or three more Kevin Spacey movies until actors are right up there with 'em. And Senators? If you're not aware of how much you hate those weasels it's probably because your homicidal urges towards them are so deep inside your mind they are hardly necessary to acknowledge, like your natural loathing of snakes, spiders, and Eastern Europeans.
Young Fred first came to national prominence in the seventies when he served as Minority Counsel to the Senate Watergate Committee, Special Counsel for both the Senate Foreign Relations and Intelligence Committees, and Big Mean Redneck Counsel to the Senate Let's Be Movie Stars And Get Girls Committee. Even as well informed a scholar as myself was surprised to learn how extensive Fred's involvement in the Watergate affair was. For those of you too young to remember the details of Watergate - The dirty stinking homo commie junkies hated President Nixon because he thought it was time somebody got a little God damn work done around here so they told a lot of lies about him on TV and chased him out of office - THE END. Anybody tells you otherwise take em out in the woods and shoot em. But don't get caught, during the Carter Administration the dirty stinking Homo commie junkies had shooting people made against the law.
By this time Fred Dalton Thompson was such a Larger Than Life Character that in his first movie, "Marie", he played the role of "Fred Dalton Thompson". That's right, Fred was such an incredible, amazing person that there wasn't a single actor in the entire entertainment industry capable of portraying him on the silver screen. Either that or he slept with the producer. I've never seen "Marie" because it stars Sissy Spacek and I'm already taking so many pills to treat my depression I excrete solid waste in gelatin capsules. I don't know what it's about but I think at the end of it Fred dumps a bucket of pig blood on Marie's head so she kills everybody through telekinesis. Boy, that telekinesis scares me so much I don't have a telephone or a television in the house - Although I still tell-a-joke from time to time! But seriously, folks, "Marie" tells the True Story of a big investigation into the Tennessee state government that actually led to the governor being sent to prison! I'll pause long enough for all you guys in Greenwich Village to grab a guitar and write a protest song. Wait, forget the song - Run over to Washington Square Park and get me a dime bag, they're playing "The Wall" on VH-1 tonight. I don't know who plays the governor in "Marie" although when he goes to prison he gets played by a whole bunch of guys. Fred played a heroic role in this scandal and became such a Media Darling that Hollywood quickly had him pegged as a "Natural". No wonder all these two bit politicians have been so hammy lately - Just the other night on Channel Sixteen a city councilman got up in the middle of a debate about zoning regulations and did a monologue from "Death Of A Salesman" that had the Mayor crying like a baby. My lawyer is currently taking tap and modern dance lessons in preparation for a run at State Senate. Good Luck, Pork Chop!
Fred's Big Mean Redneck character usually appears in two movie contexts:
1) The Good Big Mean Redneck. The Good Big Mean Redneck comes into the movie and tells everybody stuff like "Awright now, boys - In about three minutes ten million pissed off Red Chinese are gonna come in here and try to make Sweet And Sour United States Marine Corps Ass outta each n' every one of you. But you know what? I'm not worried about it! I'm not worried about it because you boys are the best! I'm not worried about it because you boys know how to kick butt! I'm not worried about it because I'm gonna hop onto this helicopter and get the hell outta here! Semper Fi! You know what's my favorite Rolling Stones song? 'Semper Fi For The Devil'!" and then everybody is like "Yeeeaaahh!! Let's do it!! Yeeeaahh!!" and they run off and save the world.
2) The Bad Big Mean Redneck. The Bad Big Mean Redneck comes in and tells everybody stuff like "Now, I have seen some sorry ass summer camp life guards in my time but I have never seen a sorry-assier bunch of summer camp life guards than the bunch I am lookin' at right now while that lil' girl in the lake is yellin' 'Help! My legs have been bitten off by an alligator and I can't swim!' Dang nabbit, quit sittin' there lookin' at me and my big flappy fish lips and get in that lake and save that lil' gal! Uh oh, she's dead. Never mind. Damn!" and then everybody is like "We're not gonna let Mister Fish Lips down, are we!?! We're gonna have The Best Summer Ever!! Yeeeaaahh!! Let's do it!! Yeeeaahh!!" and they run off and save the world.
Whatta Man! I haven't been so choked up since Puck's wedding on MTV. But why the hell didn't Pedro show up?

When you're a big mean redneck like Fred and you are an actor it is inevitable that you get cast as an evil white supremacist - When I was in New York I used to go into bars and snarl about Al Sharpton for free drinks, spare change, and cigarettes - and Fred was cast as such a delightful character in Michael Mann's NBC "Crime Story" series. People swear "Crime Story" was the greatest thing in the history of TV but this was back in my drug days and I couldn't turn on my TV set without psychedelic psychotic samurais coming out of the screen to scare the shit out of me. I might have risked it if I had been aware that Jerry Lewis and The Diceman were on "Crime Story" but nobody told me. Maybe they did tell me, but everything sounded like "John, run over to Washington Square Park and get a dime bag" in those days. But it's a damn shame I missed Fred on that show. I needed a Positive Role Model at the time and Fred's noble example might have been just the thing to head off my tragic "Red Buttons Is God" phase.
Once Fred declared that he was running for the Senate everybody made fun of his campaign because all of a sudden he was driving all over Tennessee in a red pick up truck trying to pass himself off as some kind of Good Ol' Boy. Nobody had ever seen Fred in a red pick up truck in his life and now there he was trying to pass himself off as some kind of jackanapes in a Bruce Springsteen video. I guess every few miles Fred would pull over to the side of the road, take a shotgun down from the rack, and shoot something. Like people in Tennessee are so dumb that would make em want to vote for him. "Damn! You saw that!?! He shot a garbage bag full of leaves and rotten Chinese food! The man's got my vote, by golly!" Then again, these were the same people who had already elected Al Gore so they'll probably fall for anything. I bet Gore was riding around the state in a Chinese rickshaw passing out copies of "The Silent Spring" and Chairman Mao's Little Red Book. Hopefully Tipper was pulling the rickshaw, she could use the exercise. More Phoney Baloney - No sooner was Fred running for Senate then all of a sudden Lorrie Morgan - Country singer and really cute piece of patoot - was his Girlfriend. Way To Go, Fred! Now, if it had been me running for office I woulda gone for Shania Twain. I bet Fred flew to Europe just to flip a coin with Mutt Lange - Heads, Fred gets Shania, Mutt gets Lorrie Tails - Fred gets Lorrie, Mutt gets Shania. "And it's . . . TAILS!!" "Awww . . . " But soon as Fred was elected Lorrie was his Ex Girlfriend - Huh?!? Did anybody get a chance to sniff Fred's finger while he was tooling around in that pick up truck? This is what all of us down south were gossiping about before Britney Spears and Justin Timberlake came along. What were ya'll talking about out west and up north? Probably what a bunch of retards we are, same as usual.
One valuable service performed Senator Fred was playing the role of "Bill Clinton" in Bob Dole's rehearsals for the 1996 Presidential Debates. From the way things turned out it might have been better if Fred had played the role of "Bob Dole" in the actual debates and all of the Dole's campaign appearances. Naw, that wouldn't have worked - Clinton's too much of a crowd pleasing cheeseball to be upstaged by anyone with a minimum of class. As soon as the Democrats found out that the Republicans were bringing in Fred to play Dole they woulda sent in Pamela Anderson on a Harley Davidson wearing a bikini made out of three Elvis postage stamps to play Bill Clinton and that would be the whole ball game. You can't possibly outsleaze the Democrats, even the Bolsheviks were more tasteful than those creeps. Whose movies would you rather want your children watching - Sergei Eisenstein's or Harvey Weinstein's? I rest my case.
(Uh, John - You can't rest your big fat case yet. You haven't gotten to the part where Fred quits the Senate to be on "Law And Order - Wil Forbis, Acid Logic Editor)
Oh, crap!
There was a great clamor when Fred quit the Senate to take an acting job on "Law And Order". Hey, what the heck - "Law And Order" is a good show, the United States Senate is so screwed up it couldn't even pull off the Clinton Impeachment. Being a Senator is so retarded that getting killed in a plane crash has more prestige. Paul Wellstone's Last Words: "Bury me next to a TV set, I don't want to miss my esteemed colleague Fred Dalton Thompson on 'Law And Order'! Oy, my tuchis is aflame!" (I'm going to Hell for these jokes.) And when I get there I will personally apologize to Paul Wellstone and his entire family. Jerry Orbach is on "Law And Order" - Is there anybody as cool as My Man Jerry Orbach in the Senate? No way! True, if Jerry was in the Senate he'd probably be a Democrat but since he's a New Yorker that woulda been the end of Senator Hillary right there! Nobody could win an election against Jerry Orbach - Nobody! You think Jerry Orbach is lame enough to die in anything as pussy as a plane crash? Jerry is so cool you could shut the engine down and rip the wings off and the plane would remain airborne just on the strength of Jerry's calm, cool, collected Orbach style! That's the kinda man I want Fred Dalton Thompson to be working with. Tom Daschle? Tom Daschle saw a urinal in an airport men's room once and tried to get a cappuccino out of it. He missed his flight but it didn't crash so that's okay.
I'm going to be big mean redneck just like Fred Dalton Thompson when I grow up. Me and the three idiots who work at the dump where I get my deep fried peanut butter and banana sandwiches are going to follow his Path To Glory just as John, Paul, George, and Ringo set forth on Elvis' forty years ago. Yes, America - As long as there are hysterical boobs running around screaming and yelling like hysterical little bitches there will be a need for big mean rednecks like Fred Dalton Thompson to slap the shit out of em before they really make assholes out of themselves. Remember what Acid Logic was like before I came along? Those people were on the verge of horoscopes and dessert recipes before I showed up.
Aw, who am I kidding? In 2008 Hillary is going to become Supreme Dragon Lady and all us rednecks will wind up in the UN death camps to subsist on boiled rocks and be human guinea pigs in scientific experiments run by the bass player of R.E.M. such as "What is the reaction of the redneck to a Margaret Cho cable special while I jump up and down on his testicles on a pogo stick while dressed up Julianne Moore in 'Far From Heaven'?". But that's allright, we won't even know the difference. Once you've made it through four years of Jimmy Carter in the White House anything is an improvement.
Oh no! I forgot the Barney Frank jokes!

Why Al Qaeda Is Doomed, from Pat Dollard's blog

For the second time in little over a month, we are watching Al Qaeda get it’s ass kicked by fellow Muslims. As I type, the Lebanese Army is blasting Al Qaeda Jihadis to death, just weeks after the Sunnis of Al Anbar did the same and cleansed themselves of the terrorist interlopers.
Al Qaeda is a profit-driven criminal enterprise that utilizes religious philosophy, specifically Sharia law, to recruit, motivate and control the personnel necessary to execute its criminal endeavors. And therein lies its achilles heel. It must deliver on its promise of the Sharia state, and utltimately the Sharia planet, or lose its footsoldiers. In both the Al Anbar province and Lebanon, Al Qaeda attempted to establish Sharia states ruled by Al Qaeda members. This, of course, threatened those who were already in power.
Ultimately, every society will have a predominant power ( governance ) which will be comprised of identifiable individuals. Al Qaeda has gained traction in the Muslim world with it’s promise of Islamic conquest of non-Islamic nations. However, the fact that Al Qaeda will also have to gain governmental control of Muslim nations has been overlooked by the Muslim world. In other words, Al Qaeda, given it’s essential and defining promise of a “perfect” Sharia world, must not only overthrow non-Muslim governments, but all Muslim governments as well, since none currently meet the standards of Al Qaeda’s “perfect” Sharia state. And, more importantly, none of them are populated by members of Al Qaeda. The Sunnis of Al Anbar turned on Al Qaeda not because of being “fed up” with Al Qaeda-caused civilian casualties and other such difficulties of war, but because Al Qaeda literally attempted to establish Al Anbar as a Sharia state under its own governmental control. Once Al Qaeda started operating Sharia courts and other Sharia processes, the Sunni Sheiks who currently rule Al Anbar took up arms and ejected them.
The same is now happening in Lebanon.
Ever society has rulers. The current rulers of Islam, like any rulers, are not prone to abdicating their power. Ultimately, the war on terror will only be won when Islam, the host body to the parasite of Jihad, stops supporting the terrorists, and in fact roots them out and destroys them.
The terrorists, by definition, have always given the Islamic powers that be the motive to destroy them. The powers that be have been too busy being amused by Al Qaeda’s tweaking of the West’s nose to confront the threat Al Qaeda poses to their rule. And the average Muslim is a human being who does not want to live within the impossible strictures of Sharia law. The moment of critical mass may be near, and our global war may be ended by the hand that fed it.

A Hole in my Life

LEES, Allison Unexpectedly on Sunday, February 11, 2007 in her 28th year. Loving daughter of David and Lee Ann Lees. Cherished sister and best friend of JD (JohnDavid). She will be sorely missed by her Grandfather John Thiel. Adored niece of Mary Ellen (Victor), Susie (Russell), Lynda (Ron) and Diane (Ed). She will be fondly remembered by her cousins Katie, Michael, Melanie and Charlie. Our dear Allison is finally free from her pain and we know that she is at peace. We will always have her in our hearts forever. A Memorial Service will be held at MacKay United Church, 257 Mackay Street on Thursday, February 15, 2007 at 2 p.m. In lieu of flowers, memorial donations in Allison's memory to the Ottawa General Hospital Mental Health Unit would be appreciated.

Yay! Someone else with a brain!

This following stuff comes from Blonde Sagacity http://mobyrebuttal.blogspot.com/

Yeah Debbie, that would be all fine and well if it was "the actions of *one* person", but unfortunately it's 20+ years of actions by thousands of people..."...A Church's Sign Against Islam Sparks Controversy: Words like "bomb" and "die" draw attention to the small sign in front of Good News Independent Baptist Church.Rev. Gary Murrell put up the sign, which on one side claims the message of Islam is "submit, convert or die." The other side reads: "When is the last time you heard of a Jew or Christian with a bomb strapped to their body?"Despite some in the Islamic community who claim the sign is offensive, Murrell says it is not a hate sign. "It was not put up there with the purpose of showing that we hate those people," he said. "It's not the people, it's the religion." (source)Of course, one of the main tenants of Islam is that it is the only true religion and not only will the Apes and pigs (infidels) not enter heaven, but they should be killed... Can't Christians believe that their religion is the only way? Is it wrong for them to point out that they normally choose rallies and handing out tracts to strapping on C4?Yeah Debbie, that would be all fine and well if it was "the actions of *one* person", but unfortunately it's 20+ years of actions by thousands of people..."...A Church's Sign Against Islam Sparks Controversy: Words like "bomb" and "die" draw attention to the small sign in front of Good News Independent Baptist Church.Rev. Gary Murrell put up the sign, which on one side claims the message of Islam is "submit, convert or die." The other side reads: "When is the last time you heard of a Jew or Christian with a bomb strapped to their body?"Despite some in the Islamic community who claim the sign is offensive, Murrell says it is not a hate sign. "It was not put up there with the purpose of showing that we hate those people," he said. "It's not the people, it's the religion." (source)Of course, one of the main tenants of Islam is that it is the only true religion and not only will the Apes and pigs (infidels) not enter heaven, but they should be killed... Can't Christians believe that their religion is the only way? Is it wrong for them to point out that they normally choose rallies and handing out tracts to strapping on C4?

See what I mean?

Check this shit out: Know Jihad

Tongue in cheek, anyone?

I found this at http://passtheammo.com/

It has been reported that an arsenal of black, shiny, scary, semi-automatic type firearms have gone on a shooting rampage, killing 30 or more students at Virginia Tech.
ABC News has just put up a poll on wether or not guns being allowed to live are the reason. So far a bunch of extremist, murdering type conservatives think guns don’t cause crime.
I think it’s safe to say that its a good thing that HB 1572, which would have allowed handguns on college campuses was shot down by a subcommittee (no pun intended) at the beginning of last year. Had that law passed, guns would have gone on a shooting rampage of epic proportions, most likely exterminating everyone except criminals. For an unbeknownst reason, guns only target law abiding citizens who refuse to defend themselves.
Better yet, ABC brilliantly uncovers the cold hard fact, that guns cause crime, BUT guns with high capacity magazines cause ALOT of crime! (yet they offer an advertisement to “stock up” on such evil things. ABC = gun loving murderers)

Islam Based Upon Secular Greed

Below are some excerpts from http://bibleprobe.com/. Just some food for thought. Let me start with a joke from the Bible Probe folks:

Osama allowed a short visit to Heaven
After his death, Osama bin Laden was allowed a short visit Heaven.
There he was greeted by George Washington, who proceeded to slap him across the face and yell at him, "How dare you try to destroy the nation I helped conceive!"
Patrick Henry approached and punched Osama in the nose and shouted, "You wanted to end our liberties but you failed."
James Madison entered, kicked Osama in the groin and said, "This is why I allowed our government to provide for the common defense!"
Thomas Jefferson came in and proceeded to beat Osama many times with a long cane and said, "It was evil men like you that provided me the inspiration to pen the Declaration of Independence!".
These beatings and thrashings continued as John Rudolph, James Monroe and 66 other early Americans came in and unleashed their anger on the Muslim terrorist leader.
As Osama lay bleeding and writhing in unbearable pain an Angel appeared.
Bin Laden wept in pain and said to the Angel, "This is not what you promised me."
The Angel replied, "I told you there would be 72 Virginians waiting for you in Heaven. What did you think I said?"

FAA PROFILING:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TRANSPORTATION SECURITY SCREENER ATTITUDE ASSESSMENT …
To insure we Americans never offend anyone, particularly fanatics intent on killing us, airport screeners will not be allowed to profile people. They will continue random searches of 80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with proper identification, Secret Service agents who are members of the President's security detail, 85-year old Congressmen with metal hips, and Medal of Honor winning former state Governors.
In accordance with this policy, Transportation Security Screener applicants are being asked to take the following test, which will ensure that employees do not harbor hidden biases that could lead to unfortunate assumptions:
--- In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, Israeli athletes were kidnapped and massacred by:
a. Olga Corbutt b. Sitting Bull c. Arnold Schwartzeneger d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
--- In 1979, the U.S. embassy in Iran was taken over by: a. Lost Norwegians b. Elvis c. A tour bus full of 80-year-old women d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
--- During the 1980's a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by: a. John Dillinger b. The King of Sweden c. The Boy Scouts d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
--- In 1983, the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by: a. A pizza delivery boy b. Pee Wee Herman c. Geraldo Rivera making up for a slow news day d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40.
--- In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered in his wheelchair and thrown overboard by: a. The Smurfs b. Davy Jones c. The Little Mermaid d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40.
--- In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a U.S. Navy diver was murdered by: a. Captain Kid b. Charles Lindberg c. Mother Teresa d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
--- In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by: a. Scooby Doo b. The Tooth Fairy c. Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
--- In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by: a. Richard Simmons b. Grandma Moses c. Michael Jordan d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
--- In 1998, the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by: a. Mr. Rogers b. Hillary Clinton c. The World Wrestling Federation d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
--- On 9/11/2001, four airliners were hijacked and destroyed and thousands of innocent people were murdered by: a. Bugs Bunny, Wile E. Coyote, Daffy Duck, Elmer Fudd b. Florida's Governor Jeb Bush c. Mr. Bean d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
--- In 2002 the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against: a. Enron b. The Lutheran Church c. The NFL d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
--- In 2002 four French journalists, including one woman, were dragged from their cars near the Pakistan border with Afghanistan, taken behind some rocks, and shot to death by: a. Gang Green's front four b. Barney c. The Smashing Pumpkins d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
--- In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by: a. Bonny and Clyde b. Captain Kangaroo c. Billy Graham d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
--- American Airlines Flight 63 from Paris to Miami on December 22, 2001 had a passenger with a ‘Shoe Bomb’ who tried to blow up the plane but was over powered and captured by passengers was: a. A distraught Al Gore gone radical 1960’s hippie mental b. Monica Lewinsky who said she was tired of hearing Bill play the Saxophone c. Donald Rumsfeld d. Richard Colvan Reid a.k.a. Tariq Rajah a.k.a. Abdel Rahim, a typical useless low life cowardly radical Muslim jerk-- caught and convicted of this crime
--- In May 2004 American Businessman Nicholas Evan Berg was captured in Iraq and beheaded by: a. The French Foreign Legion using a guillotine under direct orders from President Jacques Chirac b. A wild band of crazy Japanese Samurai Warriors c. A Philippine Truck Driver who rig ran out of control d. Committed by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of an Islamist (Muslim) terrorist group which is part of al-Qaida operating inside Iraq
Now, please review your answers according to the following key:
‘D’ – as in all answers are ‘D’
If you answered any of the questions incorrectly, please go to the following link and immediately apply for an airport screening position ... http://www.tsa.dot.gov/


Christians & Jewish martyrs say; "I will die for what I believe". A Muslim martyr says; "you will die for what I believe"....

The Qur'an cannot be trusted because it contains numerous "divinely inspired" contradictions. If God has a history of abrogating (changing) his own revelations as is done in the Qur'an, then how can we be certain he will not abrogate it again in the future? If Allah can abrogate his eternal speech, how can you trust him with your eternal soul?

A tenet of Islam is that both Mohammed and Jesus of Nazareth were both Muslims. Islam says both were prophets sent by Allah. If this were true, then it is mandatory that these two great prophets must coincide exactly in all points and never contradict each other. Did not the same Allah send both of them? Then, aren't even the smallest of contradictions between the two, very big red flags? And there are a great many, which you will see below.
Sura 5:68 - Say: "O People of the Book! ye have no ground to stand upon unless ye stand fast by the Law (Torah), the Gospel (Injeel), and all the revelation that has come to you from your Lord."
Sura 29:46 Muslims are told by Allah, not to question the authority of the scriptures of the Christians, saying, "And dispute ye not with the People of the Book, but say, "We believe in the revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you; Our Allah and your Allah is one;

Even after Allah confirmed the Torah and Gospel, Islamic Mullahs and Imams have tried to sell the lie that the Christian Gospels and Jewish Torah have been corrupted.

Muslims should note that nowhere in the Qur'an there is even a suggestion that the Christian Biblical text has been altered or corrupted. The word "tahrif" is never used with reference to the Christian Gospels (Injil). The Qur'an occasionally accuses the Jews of altering their Scripture (like in Sura 5:13); but it never levels this accusation at Christians. It in no way implies that the text of the Gospel of Jesus (Injil) has been corrupted. In fact, the Qur'an attests to the validity of the Christian Gospels, Zabur (Psalms) and the Torah.

Islam doesn't even have an original Qur'an. It was made up supposedly from "memory" and a few scraps found under a bed. This was about 150 - 200 years after Muhammad died at his wife Ayish's home in Medina, and he was lowered into a hole in the ground, where he remains.
Al Bukhari, a Muslim scholar of the 9th-10th century, and the most authoritative of the Muslim tradition compilers, writes that whenever Muhammad fell into one of his unpredictable trances his revelations were written on whatever was handy at the time. The leg or thigh bones of dead animals were used, as well as palm leaves, parchments, papers, skins, mats, stones, and bark. And when there was nothing at hand the attempt was made by his disciples to memorize it as closely as possible.
Zaid b. Thabit said: “The Prophet died and the Qur’an had not been assembled into a single place.” (p. 118, Ahmad b. `Ali b. Muhammad al `Asqalani, ibn Hajar, "Fath al Bari", 13 vols, Cairo, 1939/1348, volume 9, page 9)
Zuhri reports, 'We have heard that many Qur'an passages were revealed but that those who had memorized them fell in the Yemama fighting. Those passages had not been written down, and following the deaths of those who knew them, were no longer known; nor had Abu Bakr, nor `Umar nor `Uthman as yet collected the texts of the Qur'an.“During the battle of Yamama, 450 reciters of the Quran were killed.” (The True Guidance, An Introduction To Quranic Studies, part 4 [Light of Life - P.O. BOX 13, A-9503 Villach, Austria], p. 47- citing Ibn Kathir’s Al-Bidaya wa al-Nibaya, chapter on Battle of Yamama).
Muhammad's child wife said this after Muhammad died:
"The verse of the stoning and of suckling an adult ten times were revealed, and they were (written) on a paper and kept under my bed. When the messenger of Allah expired and we were preoccupied with his death, a goat entered and ate away the paper."
References: Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal. vol. 6. page 269; Sunan Ibn Majah, page 626; Ibn Qutbah, Tawil Mukhtalafi 'l-Hadith (Cairo: Maktaba al-Kulliyat al-Azhariyya. 1966) page 310; As-Suyuti, ad-Durru 'l-Manthur, vol. 2. page 13

The oldest Qur'an dates from around 790 A.D. (after Jesus), and it is in the British Library. That's 158 years after Muhammad’s death. See corrupted Qur'an here .

This Samarkand codice manuscript is considerably incomplete. It only begins in the middle of verse 7 of Suratul-Baqarah (the second Surah) and from there on numerous pages are missing. The next oldest Muslim manuscripts are also from the 8th-century. One is written in al-ma'il script and the other in Kufic. Neither of these correspond precisely to today's Qur'an. Also, in 1972, construction workers who were restoring the Great Mosque of Sana'a in Yemen found a cache of manuscripts scraps that differ and contradict today's Qur'an so badly, that Muslims try to hide this. These Yemeni Qur'an manuscripts date back to the 7th and 8th centures, and are actually the oldest found, and they are in Hijazi. Hijazi (Makkan or Madinan) script, is the script in which the earliest masahif of the Qur'an were written. These manuscripts calls to question whether the present Qur'an was delivered to Muslims in pristine form. Your guess is as good as mine as to who in addition to Muhammad made up the Qur'an.

ISLAM, LIKE SATAN - WANTS ONLY SLAVES....
Most Muslims do not realize that Islam allows no freedom. This alone should make them realize that it is Satan behind Islam, and not an eternal God. Satan wishes only to enslave Muslims to help him enslave the entire world. He does this by turning them away from the truth -- that salvation is yours already, if you only have faith in God's Son, Jesus. Islam is a religion based on intimidation and fear. The word "Islam" does not mean "peace." It means "submission." A Muslim is not allowed to leave Islam or else risk his or her life. At birth, a person is branded either Muslim or non-Muslim depending on one's descent.
Among other things, the religion of Islam is a brain-washing religion, and that is why so many Muslims turn into crazy mindless zombies. The Muslims are required to pray 5 times a day in Arabic to a God who is not there, from the moment they embrace Islam; and when they do so they touch their head to the floor. That is one reason they get so brain-washed, this repetitive prayer. You can often spot fanatical Muslims by the marks on their foreheads resulting from this repetitive touching their head to the floor, where they may whack their head if they really get into it. As an example, take a look at the below image (and all others released) of Osama's Al Qaida second in command, Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri, who always gives an anti-U.S. rant; Dr. Ayman has this tell-tale bruise on his forehead from too much head-whacking.
If you are a Muslim, and not praying the mandatory 5 times a day (in Arabic), which must be preceded by the ritual washing/ablution (Wudu) , according to Muhammad you are in great danger of going to hell. Muslims may be excused from observing the other pillars of Islam like fasting, almsgiving, pilgrimage to Mecca. But, no Muslim is ever excused from mandatory 5 times a day prayer. In Christianity there is no compulsion or mandatory prayer. The Lord God has given Christians free will. Christians know they are to honor God every day, and not just on a Sunday. Muslims should count their "blessings". During Muhammad's fanciful mystical Night Journey to Heaven, Muhammad said that he was originally told by Allah to command his followers to pray fifty times daily, but later Allah revealed this to be too much of a burden. What Muhammad probably meant was he soon found out that even he couldn't keep up with fifty mandatory prayer sessions a day. So like many Sura's you'll see below, miraculously a Sura appeared to help Muhammad out in his personal life.
In Christianity, there is no such compulsion. Yahweh wants heartfelt prayers. Not scripted prayers. Christians know enough to speak with God as their "Abba" (literally - daddy in Aramaic). Muslims typically never even think of one-on-one, two-way prayers to God. Muslim prayers resemble a "broadcast"; and no reply from their Allah is usually ever expected.

BUT, WHAT ABOUT THE CRUSADES - YOU MAY BE ASKING:Every Christian who participated in the Crusades, did so, against the teachings of Jesus.However, in retrospect, the Crusades probably allowed the western world a thousand years of freedom from the diabolical Islamic religion. The Crusaders stopped the expansion of the Islamic empire. This allowed Christianity to prosper in Europe which preserved the gospel for the rest of the world to receive. The Crusades were a reaction to the Muslim crusades against the entire world. In the 7th century, the Muslims took control of Jerusalem, and in the 11th century they began to hassle, kill, molest Christian pilgrims in the Jerusalem area. The Muslim Turks even attacked Rome and Belgrade in 1456 A.D. The Crusades were also in response to the cries of help from the eastern Byzantine Empire, which was very worried about the military threat to it from the Seljuk Turks. So if the Christians did not respond, the Muslims would have conquered all of Europe and wiped out Christianity from the planet. Did this have any significance to Osama bin Laden's sick mind? The Muslim high point in Europe ended when they were turned back from Vienna on September 11, 1683 A.D.
In AD 1009, Kalif Hakem of Egypt ordered the destruction of the Holy Sepulcher and all Christian places of worship in Jerusalem. Christians were persecuted cruelly and pilgrims were attacked.
Here is a speech from Pope Urban II to Christians from this Crusader era:
For your brethren who live in the east are in urgent need of your help, and you must hasten to give them the aid which has often been promised to them. For, as most of you have heard, the Turks and Arabs have attacked them and have conquered the territory of Romania (the Greek empire) as far west as the shore of the Mediterranean and the Hellespont, which is called the Arm of St. George. They have occupied more and more of the lands of those Christians, and have overcome them in seven battles. They have killed and captured many, and have destroyed the churches and devastated the empire. If you permit them to continue thus for a while with impunity, the faithful of God will be much more widely attacked by them. On this account I, or rather the Lord, beseech you as Christ's heralds to publish this everywhere and to persuade all people whatever rank, foot-soldiers and knights, poor and rich, to carry aid promptly to those Christians and to destroy that vile race from the lands of our friends.
SPAIN UNDER THE MOORSNeither was Spain under the Muslim Moors the jewel of Islamic tolerance that it is often purported to be. In 920 A.D. all the inhabitants of Muez were put to the sword. Cordova, Zarajoza and Merida were burned to the ground, with all adult males executed and all women and children enslaved. In AD 1066 all the Jews of Grenada were slaughtered. In AD 1126, all the Christians of Grenada were deported to Morocco.
CARNAGE IN CONSTANTINOPLEUnder Mehmet II the Turks conquered the great Byzantine capital, Constantinople. On 29 May, 1453 A.D., waves of Turkish soldiers swept into Constantinople, the greatest city in the world at that time, and put it to the sword. Priceless libraries and irreplaceable works of art were burned, the population slaughtered, even in the Hagia Sophia, the greatest Christian church in the world at that time. For centuries the Turks demanded an annual “blood levy” of Christian boys. Parents were forced to hand over one out of every five Christian boys for service in the Sultan’s army as janissaries.
In 1860 over 12,000 Christians were slaughtered in Lebanon. In 1876 14,700 Bulgarians were murdered by the Turks. 200,000 Armenian Christians were slaughtered by the Turks in Bayazid in 1877. And in 1915 the Turks massacred over 1.5 million Armenian Christians. As recently as September 1922 the Turkish army destroyed the ancient city of Smyrna with its 300,000 Christian population.

April 27, 2007Prayer by Sheik Ahmad Bahr, acting Speaker of the Palestinian Legislative Council, declared during a Friday sermon at a Sudan mosque that America and Israel will be annihilated and called upon Allah to kill Jews and Americans "to the very Last One".
"Oh Allah, vanquish the Jews and their supporters. Oh Allah, count their numbers, and kill them all, down to the very last one. Oh Allah, show them a day of darkness. Oh Allah, who sent down His Book, the mover of the clouds, who defeated the enemies of the Prophet defeat the Jews and the Americans, and bring us victory over them."

Sura 29:27 states clearly that, as far as Allah and the Qur'an are concerned, the only true prophets are those related to Isaac (Ishaq) or Jacob (Yaqoub); yet Muhammad, according to Muslim tradition, is related to Ishmael and not Isaac or Jacob.

In his book, "Islam and Terrorism", the former professor of Islamic history at Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt (pen name: Mark A. Gabriel, PHD) says on Page 5-6: "Even the prophet of Islam, Muhammad, practiced his faith in many ways that contradicted the Quran. The Quran said that Muhammad was sent to show the mercy of God to the world. But he became a military dictator, attacking, killing and taking plunder to finance his empire. How is that showing mercy? Mark further writes: Allah, the god revealed in the Quran, is not a loving father. It says that he desires to lead people astray (Surah 6:39, 126; 43:36-37). He does not help those who are led astray by him (Surah 30:29) and desires to use them to populate hell (Surah 32:13)". So, the Qur'an says that the god of Islam works with Satan and demons to lead people astray.

Ayatollah Khomeini, an Iranian "butcher" gives us a clear insight into what awaits countries who fall to Islam's satanic grasp:Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini explains what happens when these murderous mullah's take over:According to Khomeini:
"Killing is a form of mercy because it rectifies the person. Sometimes a person cannot be reformed unless he is cut up and burned. You must kill, burn and lock up those in opposition."


The Qur’an talks only about scourging and exiling the adulterer, yet Muhammad himself stoned some adulterers. Thus, stoning the married adulterer (male or female) and not flogging them, has become Islamic law. The reason for that is that Muhammad said and did so.
Under Iran's brutal Islamic Sharia Laws, women usually get stoned for crimes against chastity. While men who even murder someone in a fit of rage in these cases, usually get only a few years in jail.
Under Iran's strict Sharia law, women sentenced to execution by stoning have their hands bound behind their back. They are wrapped from head to toe in sheets before being seated in a pit. The ditch is filled up to their breasts with dirt, and the soil is packed tightly before people assemble to execute the woman by pitching rocks at her head and upper body.
Article 104 of the Iranian Penal Code states that the stones used for execution should "not be large enough to kill the person by one or two strikes, nor should they be so small that they could not be defined as stones."
Ironically, the court sentenced the woman's brother Abu Bakr Ghorbany and husband Mohammad Daneshfar to only six years in jail for killing her lover. According to Sharia law, murder carries a lesser penalty than "crimes against chastity."

One time a woman was brought to Muhammad who had committed adultery. They asked him, "What shall we do with her? Muhammad said, "Go away. Bring her back after the baby is born." So they brought her back after the baby was born, and Muhammad said, "Let her go and nurse the child. Bring her back when the child is two years old." So they brought her back, and Muhammad said, "Take the baby from her and kill her." And that is what they did. Reference: "Islam and Terrorism", Page 203-204
The Islamic Qur'an itself is responsible for cruelty toward Muslim women, both young and old. In short, this evil book likens a woman to a field (or a tilth). This "field" is to be used by a Muslim man as he sees fit. This "model" was set forth by Muhammad himself, and what he said and how he treated women. If a woman does not consent to make love, civil law of western countries consider this as rape, plain and simple. However the Quran does not ask women. It takes into account only the will of the husband.
The Quran in Sura (Chapter) 2:223 says:
Your women are your fields, so go into your fields whichever way you like . . . . (MAS Abdel Haleem, The Qur’an, Oxford UP, 2004)


Pre-Islamic history tells us that many Arabian tribes were stone worshippers. This is also mentioned in Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol 5, #661. The Old Testament also talks about Mideast pagan groups that worshipped stones.
When Muhammad was born in Mecca, each Arab tribe in Mecca had their own deity. There was a large black meteor found in the desert which many Arabs believed was sent to them by astral deities. This rock was placed in the southeast corner of the cube-shaped structure in Mecca. The arabs knew this rock as the Ka'ba, which means stone. The black rock's diameter is about 12 inches. It is reddish black in color, and has red and yellow particles. During this time before Islam this stone was part of the shrine to worship of a chief male god (among over 350 other gods) who was known as Hubal. The black meteor stone was said to symbolize a nature god known as al-Hajar al-Aswad. Hubal was an oracular deity whose statue -- in human form and made of red carneol -- stood in the Ka'ba until Muhammad destroyed it. The Kaba is about 50 feet high, and the walls are about 40 feet long. The facade contains the door, which starts at 7 feet off the ground, and faces N.E.. To enter the Kaba, a ladder must be used. Also built in the eastern corner, is another stone called "lucky". This stone is only touched, not kissed. Pagans called out the names of their pagan gods as they circled the Kaba the same as Muslims do today, calling out Allah's name. Early Meccan Pagans also ran between the nearby hills. Muhammad authorized Muslims to do that in the Quran, and Muhammad probably ran between the hills himself. So, even before Muhammad pagans were worshipping this black stone in the Kaba. Are we surprised that although Muhammad proclaimed only one God, he continued to participate in idol worship at this pagan shrine (Kaba); and Muslims still do idol worship there today? The black stone of Ka'aba is nothing but a holdover within Islam, from pre-Islamic paganism.
There is evidence that black stones were commonly worshipped in the Arab world. In 190 A.D. Clement of Alexandria mentioned that "the Arabs worship stone". He was alluding to the black stone of Dusares at Petra. In the 2nd century, Maximus Tyrius wrote; "The Arabians pay homage to I know not what god, which they represent by a quadrangular stone". Maximus was speaking of the Kaaba (Ka'ba) that contains the Black Stone.
The Qurash (aka: Quraish) tribe which Muhammad belonged to was in charge of idol worship at the Ka'ba Shrine. The chief god of Muhammad's tribe was one of the three sister goddesses called al-Uzza, the youngest of the three daughters of the pre-Islamic Allah and the patron goddess of Mecca. Her name means "the mighty one". The other two were named "al-Lat and "al-Manat". It was only by chance that a fortune teller counseled Muhammad's grandfather against sacrificing Muhammad's father to this al-Uzza pagan diety. The head of these pagan, animalistic deities was "Al-llah". It is believed that "al-llah" in Muhammad's time before Islam referred to a vague moon god and that Muhammad believed that al-Uzza was a daughter of this "al-llah".
The Qurash tribe's Allah corresponded to the god Bel, which is another name of the Assyrio-Babylonian gods En-lil and Marduk. It has the same meaning as Baal. The Arabic today translates the word Allah as "God". Muhammad's father's name was "Abd-Allah" (or slave of Allah). When Muhammad says there is only one god - Allah - now you have an idea what his background / thinking was; and who this Allah actually is.
Of note: in 1988, Salman Rushdie's novel "Satanic Verses" contained the above as the basis for that book. This book led Ayatollah Khomeni to offer a $3 million bounty on the India born Muslim Salman Rushdie. But Salman Rushdie did not lie about Islam's early Satanic beginning! He merely reported the truth. And truth is something Islam cannot tolerate.

Muhammad adopted Zaid because Muhammad had no sons. Zaid married a stunningly beautiful woman named Zainab. Once when Muhammad was visiting Zaid's home he accidentally saw Zaibab in scanty attire. Muhammad was overcome with lust. In the Koran we are told that it was Allah who caused Muhammad's heart to desire Zainab. And that it was Allah's Will for Zaid to divorce his wife so that Muhammad could marry her. Muhammad married Zainab in June 626 A.D. This Allah therefore desires lust and coveting a "neighbor's" wife. Naturally, his followers began to murmur about their pious prophet acting this way. So, lo and behold yet another Sura was immediately and miraculously given from Allah that absolved Muhammad personally.Sura 33:37-38 (Noble Qur'an) Behold! Thou didst say to one who had received the grace of Allah and thy favour: "Retain thou (in wedlock) thy wife, and fear Allah." But thou didst hide in thy heart that which Allah was about to make manifest: thou didst fear the people, but it is more fitting that thou shouldst fear Allah. Then when Zaid had dissolved (his marriage) with her, with the necessary (formality), We joined her in marriage to thee: in order that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the Believers in (the matter of) marriage with the wives of their adopted sons, when the latter have dissolved with the necessary (formality) (their marriage) with them. And Allah's command must be fulfilled. There can be no difficulty to the Prophet in what Allah has indicated to him as a duty. It was the practice (approved) of Allah amongst those of old that have passed away. And the command of Allah is a decree determined. Or, was it more of Muhammad's scheming, and making up the rules to get his own way with this beautiful woman? We note elsewhere where Muhammad laid with a 9 year old girl (Ayisha) when Muhammad was in his 50's, and also a beautiful 17 year old Jewish girl (Safiyah) - one day after Muhammad had her family massacred. Although Muhammad fixed the legal number of wives as 4 for his followers, Muhammad let it be known that Allah gave Muhammad himself the special privilege of any number of wives. Muhammad again miraculously received a Sura giving himself the privilege of cohabitating with his female slaves.

How can we live peacefully with those who believe so fanatically in such an arbitrary, cruel, contradictory system of questionable salvation? They kill their own for a pittance. Their own women, killed with rocks, in public. Barbarian inhuman brutes, behaving like animals, should be treated like animals: punishment for the destruction of human life always ends in capital punishment for animals in our society. Glass Mecca? Maybe not, since there are undoubtedly innocents in that city. Blindfolds and firing squads for the indiscriminate animalistic slayers of innocents? ABSOLUTELY!!

When Muhammad began to preach his new religion in 610 A.D. the leaders of Mecca were strongly opposed. In 622 A.D. Muhammad was approached by the elders from a town located some 250 miles north of Mecca who asked Muhammad to be their ruler. Muhammad accepted on the conditions that they would also accept him as a prophet and that he could bring his followers. The exodus to this town, later known as Medina is known by Muslims as the "hijra". The Meccans attacked the Medinans several times, but the Medinans always managed to drive them off. In 627 A.D. the Meccans were defeated by Muhammad's forces, and the Muslims returned to Mecca and cleansed the "kaba" of all its idols. Muhammad continued to rule Medina, where he died in 632 A.D.
Muslims should be reminded of Muhammad's own humanity, fickleness and unworthiness. Muhammad was extremely close to Jews in the beginning of his campaigns of rape, plunder, and murder. In those days, Muhammad realized he could only capture Mecca and Medina with Jewish help.
Hoping to garner Jewish support for those military campaigns, Muhammad had yet another vision that his Allah wanted Muslims to do their praying (salla or sallatun) facing (Qibla) the then Christian city of Jerusalem.
Muhammad stopped this practice when he realized there was no hope that the Jews would join Islam. Henceforth Muhammad and his Allah stopped the practice of facing Jerusalem and ordered all prayers to henceforth be said while facing in the direction of Mecca. Yusuf Ali points out in footnote 141, commenting on Sura 2:142, Muhammad chose Jerusalem for this purpose, but later on, when they proved stubborn in rejecting his apostleship, he came up with a complete change in the direction of prayer; that is, towards Mecca rather than Jerusalem.

And the next bit turns my stomach:
In this day and age we would even consider Muhammad a pedophile. Muhammad's sexual appetite was legendary. Even "Sahih Al-Bukhari" says Muhammad slept with his 11 wives in one night. Muhammad is estimated by scholars to have had somewhere between 15-25 wives. All agree that he had 9 wives at the time of his death.
Muhammad’s was sexually involved with at least 22 women. Although in the Quran he would limit his followers to having four wives, he himself took more than four wives and many concubines. The question of the number of women with whom Muhammad was sexually involved either as wives, concubines or devotees was made a point of contention by the Jews in Muhammad's day. Ali Dashti comments:
"All the commentaries agree that verse 57 of Sura 4 (on-Nesa) was sent down after the Jews criticized Mohammad's appetite for women, alleging that he had nothing to do except to take wives" (Ali Dashti, 23 Years, pp. 120-138).
Muhammad's first wife - Khadija, died a few years before he fled to Medina. Later, he was encouraged to take another wife. At the age of 49 he was betrothed to Aisha, age six in 624 A.D. Aisha was his closest friend's, Abu Bakr's, daughter. Abu Bakr was Muhammad’s daily companion and one of his first believers and successor of Muhammad. We can rightfully imagine 6 year old Aisha picking up her toys and moving to Muhammad's house, where he demurely waited until she was nine to have sexual intercourse with her.
In the first year of Muhammad's residence at Yathrib (now Medina) the "Prophet" who never prophesized, celebrated his marriage to Ayisha. Ayisha was then only a young girl (jariyah) of 9-years old per Al-Bukhari, Abu Dawud and Tabari Aisha was 9 when they Muhammad sexually consummated his marriage with her. Muhammad 52.
Aisha herself testified to these facts:
“The messenger of God betrothed me when I was six years old and then married me when I was nine years old.”
Source: Sahih Muslim (by Imam al-Mawawy), vol. 3, p. 577.
Lying with a 9 year old girl in this century or in the 7th century is abominable. It was abominable then in Arabian society also. Particularly distasteful about Muhammad, is that after Muhammad deflowered this young 9 year old girl, he also taught that his followers were to follow his "sunnah" or lifestyle. And his followers do follow the example of this warrior "prophet", who made no prophecies. In the last century, the cruel Iranian Ayatollah Khomeini married a ten-year old girl, when he was 28 years old. This "mad Ayatollah" called marriage to a prepubescent girl a "divine blessing". He is quoted to have said to fellow Muslims; "Do your best to ensure your daughters do not see their first blood in your house".
Ayatollah Khomeini told the Muslim faithful that marrying a girl before she begins menstration was a "divine blessing." He then told Muslim fathers: "Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house."
The following is the story of Safiyah Bint Huyeiy Ibn Akhtab, the Jewish woman who was captured when Muhammad’s troops attacked Kheibar and brought her to the Prophet as part of his share of the booty. This story, is reported in the Book of Tabaqat Safiyah was seventeen and very beautiful when Muslims killed her father, husband and many of her relatives. In the same day the Prophet of Allah wanted to sleep with her. Here is the exact text of the story:
She was groomed and made-up for the Prophet by Umm Sulaim, the mother of Anas ibn Malik. They spent the night there. Abu Ayyub al-Ansari guarded the tent of the Prophet the whole night. When, in the early dawn, the Prophet saw Abu Ayyub strolling up and down, he asked him what he meant by this sentry-go; he replied: "I was afraid for you with this young lady. You had killed her father, her husband and many of her relatives, and till recently she was an unbeliever. I was really afraid for you on her account". The Prophet prayed for Abu Ayyub al-Ansari (Ibn Hisham, p. 766) Safiyah had requested the Prophet to wait till he had gone a stage away from Khaibar. "Why?" asked the Prophet. "I was afraid for you on account of the Jews who still happened to be near at Khaibar!" The reason Safiyah rejected the sexual advances of the 57-year-old Muhammad should be obvious to any objective person. I believe most women prefer to mourn than jump into bed with the killer of their father, husband and many relatives on the same day of their death. But the fact that the prophet of Allah could not contain his sexual urges for one day to let this young girl grieve, says a lot of his thinking and moral character.
“The next day a Walima (wedding-feast) was arranged on behalf of the Prophet…
Note that the historian is saying that the wedding took place one day after the prophet got private with Safiyah and made his moves to have sex with her. This presented no problem for the Muhammad as he had his Allah reveal a verse personally agreeable to himself saying it is okay to sleep with women captured in war without marrying them even if they are married.

Well, that's enough "stirring the pot" for now. NB: All the above quotes come from others who have not yet mastered the ins and outs of punctuation and grammar. This should not influence you unduly, as not all clear thinkers are scholars.

Aliens Who Won't Live in Harmony with Us Should GET OUT and Go Back to Their Traditional Homes

Got this from Pat Dollard's blog: a different take on my post May 6, and goes right to the heart of my disgust.


What Does Muslim Immigration Cost Europe?
Do gang rapes boost GDP? That was an offensive question, you say? 100.000 young Swedish girls live as virtual prisoners

From Global PoliticianFjordman - 5/10/2007Do gang rapes boost GDP? Was that an offensive question, you say? Well, according to Sweden’s finance minister Pär Nuder, more immigrants should be allowed into Sweden in order to safeguard the welfare system. However, in reality estimates indicate that immigration costs Sweden at least 40 to 50 billion Swedish kroner every year, probably several hundred billions, and has greatly contributed to bringing the Swedish welfare state to the brink of bankruptcy. An estimated cost of immigration of 225 billion Swedish kroner in 2004, which is not unlikely, would equal 17.5% of Sweden’s tax income that year, a heavy burden in a country which already has some of the highest levels of taxation in the world.
At the same time, the number of rape charges in Sweden has quadrupled in just above twenty years. Rape cases involving children under the age of 15 are six times as common today as they were a generation ago. Resident aliens from Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia dominate the group of rape suspects. Lawyer Ann Christine Hjelm, who has investigated violent crimes in one court, found that 85 per cent of the convicted rapists were born on foreign soil or by foreign parents. Swedish politicians want to continue Muslim immigration because it boosts the economy, yet the evidence so far indicates that it mainly boosts the number of gang rapes. Meanwhile, research shows that fear of honor killings is a very real issue for many immigrant girls in Sweden. 100.000 young Swedish girls live as virtual prisoners of their own families.
An ever growing group of non-western immigrants in Norway is dependent on welfare. This was the conclusion of a study by Tyra Ekhaugen of the Frisch Centre for Economic Research and the University of Oslo. Ekhaugen’s research contradicted the often heard assertion that Norway’s labor market depends increasingly on immigrants. The study indicated quite the reverse. If the present evolution continues, immigration will increase the pressure on the welfare state rather than relieving it because many immigrants do not join the tax-paying part of the population. “Non-Western immigrants” in Norway are recipients of social security benefits ten times as frequently as native Norwegians. If we remember that “non-Western immigrants” include Chinese, Indians and other non-Muslims who are known for (and statistically proven to be) hard working, this speaks volumes of the heavy burden Muslims constitute on the welfare state.
Journalist Halvor Tjønn from newspaper Aftenposten, one of the few genuinely critical journalists in the country, in June 2006 cited a report from NHO, the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise. NHO stated that the current immigration policies were a serious threat to the country’s economy. Norway is the planet’s third largest exporter of oil, next to Saudi Arabia and Russia. Yet according to NHO, there is a risk that much of the profit Norway earns from oil could be spent on paying welfare for a rapidly growing immigrant population. The most profitable immigration would be high-skilled workers who stay for period of limited duration, but at the same time not too brief. A Danish think tank has estimated that the net cost of immigration was up to 50 billion kroner every year, and those were cautious estimates. Denmark could thus save huge sums by stopping immigration from less developed countries. A study found that every other immigrant from the Third World — especially from Muslim countries — lacked the qualifications for even the most menial jobs on the organized Danish labor market.
Professor Kjetil Storesletten at the University of Oslo said that the net contribution of immigrants to the economy was probably negative inNorway, too. “Admitting immigrants with low levels of education leads nowhere. We cannot continue the immigration policies we have followed until now,” said Storesletten. In Norway, social benefits and salaries for low-skilled workers are among the highest in the world. At the same time, the salaries for highly skilled workers are comparatively lower and the taxes are high. This compressed salary structure is the result of decades of Socialist policies in Scandinavia. It leads to attracting people with lower skills and little education, but also makes the countries less attractive for researchers and scientists. Still, the agency that handles immigration to Norway, UDI, in 2005 thought that the country must make it more attractive for both skilled and unskilled workers to move to Norway. “We need more immigrants,” claimed UDI chief Trygve Nordby. “Too few dare to say that we have a large need for non-professional workers as well,” he said. UDI, in turn, should be able to have more flexibility in deciding cases, and process cases more quickly and efficiently. As it turned out later, the bureaucrats of UDI were in fact so “flexible” that they had been running their own, private immigration policies, and that the agency’s liberal interpretation of asylum rules had “stretched the boundaries” of the law. UDI violated both the law and political directives when it granted residency permits to nearly 200 Iraqi Kurds in the fall of 2005. A commission that probed the controversial permits blasted the former head of UDI, Trygve Nordby, and his successor resigned. More than half of the social security benefits in the city of Oslo are spent of non-Western immigrants, a portion that has grown tremendously over the years. City council leader Erling Lae warns against prejudice and states that without immigrants, there would be “complete chaos” in Oslo. Meanwhile, Norwegian newspapers are worried that online debates are “flooded with racist comments” about Muslims. One of the racist comments they mentioned was this one: “A large number of Muslims out of their own, free will choose to live in parallel societies where they speak their mother tongue, watch foreign TV, despise the society they have moved to and pick spouses from their original homelands. The only contact they have with the natives is in the social security office.”
“The debate is often colored by ignorance. It is not a human right to be heard at any given time. It requires a certain minimum of social intelligence to be allowed to participate in the public debate,” says Esten O. Sæther, online editor of the Leftist, pro-Multicultural newspaper Dagbladet. Sæther warns that the newspapers may have to impose stricter censorship on their online discussion forums and the comments to online articles. However, Dagbladet seems to have little understanding of why so many people are fed up with Muslims and their demands. Neither have they admitted that they were wrong in their one-sided praise of the positive effects of Muslim immigration for decades, nor apologized for demonizing the right-wing Progress Party and its leader Carl I. Hagen throughout the 90s for their “racism” for questioning the real costs of this immigration.
On the contrary, although information about the costs of Muslim immigration has been available for several years, this was a non-issuein Norwegian media prior to the national elections in 2005. Instead, they were focusing on “poverty” in Norway and the need for increased welfare spending. This in a country that is among the wealthiest in the world and which provides its citizens with the highest social security benefits in Europe. Norway’s media coverage of the national elections revealed a desire for a Leftist government, said Election expert Aarebrot, a professor at the Institute for Comparative Politics at the University of Bergen. He argued that, with few exceptions, most of Norway’s media leans to the left politically. “Most newspapers are what I would call politically correct. By politically correct in Norway today I mean slightly radical, urban and liberal,” Aarebrot said. Nearly 70 percent of journalists vote Labor (Ap), Socialist Left (SV) or Red Electoral Alliance (RV) according to a poll, and this is reflected in the press, Aarebrot said.
Oslo will have a non-Western majority in a few decades, if the current trends continue. There are now several researchers who predict that in Norway, Sweden and Denmark, the native population and their descendants will become a minority in their own country within this century. The only question is when. Since the Islamic Jihad usually enters a much more aggressive and physical phase once the Muslim population reaches 10 – 20% of the total in any given area, this does not bode well for the future of the urban regions in Scandinavia. Will they turn out different from similar regions in Thailand, the Philippines or Nigeria?
Admittedly, part of the problem lies with the Western European welfare state system itself and cannot be blamed on the immigrants alone. Iranian Nima Sanandaji tells of his family’s meeting with the Swedish system: “In Sweden my family encountered a political system that seemed very strange. The interpreter told us that Sweden is a country where the government will put a check into your mailbox each month if you don’t work. She explained that there was no reason to get a job.” “Although my mother got several jobs, we concluded that this really didn’t improve our family’s economy. During the sixteen years we have been in Sweden, my mother has in total worked less than one year.”
However, part of the problem is also due to the mentality of some of the Muslims who move there, yet display no loyalty to their new countries. Immigrant men who divorce their wives according to secular law, but stay married to them according to sharia, Islamic law, represent an increasing problem in the city of Odense, Denmark, according to Erik Simonsen, deputy major in charge of administration. The result is a large number of “single” women who receive welfare support. From other countries, it is known that some Muslim men to do this trick with several women at the same time. Some observers blamed the Muslim riots in France in 2005, accurately described by writer Mark Steyn as the “first welfare funded Jihad in history,” on polygamy practiced by Muslim men, paid for by French taxpayers. But also immigrants who are financially independent are cheating, says Simonsen. “80 percent of the immigrant economy in Odense is a black market economy. That’s a lot, and it cannot be tolerated, because the law is equal for all.”
As one Muslim in Norway stated: “I worked in a Pakistani shop, but all of the work there is ‘unofficial.’ Neither the boss nor I pay taxes to Norwegian authorities. In addition to this, I receive 100% disability benefits and welfare. I have to be cunning to make as much money as possible, since this is my only objective with being in Norway.” Undoubtedly, many Muslims view welfare money from the infidels as Jizya, the poll-tax non-Muslims according to the Koran are supposed to pay to Muslims as tribute and a sign of their inferior status and submission to Islamic rule. In Britain, one member of an Islamic group warned an undercover reporter against getting a job because it would be contributing to the kuffar (non-Muslim) system.
One of the reasons for the low participation in the work force among Muslims is a very high drop out rate from schools, especially for boys. Although Muslims themselves blame this on “poor integration efforts” and “marginalization,” some of them are actively obstructing their kids’ education, lest they become too much like the infidels. Thousands of Muslim children with Scandinavian citizenship are sent to Koran schools in Pakistan and other countries, to prevent them from becoming “too Westernized.” When this practice was documented and criticized by the Norwegian organization Human Rights Service, Pakistanis in Norway had the galls to ask for a school for their children in Pakistan, funded by Norwegian taxpayers. They will probably get it.According to the Copenhagen Post, in Denmark when the country’s schools open their doors again after the summer holidays, not every student is there to enter. Some schools report one in every five students missing from the schoolrooms. Daily newspaper Berlingske Tidende reported that some children had not returned from vacation in their homelands with their parents. ‘When students are kept away from school start, it’s a big problem for their integration and can affect the children’s educational level,’ said Integration Minister Rikke Hvilshøj. She said a committee would discuss methods to get parents to send their children to school from day one. ‘These are children who have problems beforehand following what’s going on at school,’ Hvilshøj said. ‘Not being there when the school year starts won’t make it any easier. We need to make parents understand that if their children are to get a good chance in Denmark, they need to make sure that they are there when school starts.’ Author and journalist Rushy Rahsid said she had often gone on long vacations to Pakistan with her parents as a child. ‘Families go on such long trips to give their children a healthy dose of religion, culture, traditions, and family,’ she said. ‘If you buy a very expensive ticket, you want to take full advantage of the trip and meet the entire family.’
Not that the problems always disappear when they actually attend school, either. Going to school is no child’s game for many children in Copenhagen, where beatings, kicks, robberies, and threats have everyday occurrences. The perpetrators are normally their own age. Violence and threats pose such a big problem in high schools in Malmö, Sweden, that the local school board wants to install surveillance cameras and security guards in the buildings. The city’s education director Matz Nilsson said unruly and aggressive students had become a more common sight in the high schools of Malmö, the home of some of Scandinavia’s biggest and roughest slums.
In the spring of 2006, police were deployed at a Berlin school after teachers complained that they could not cope with their students’ aggression and disrespect. A teacher who recently left the school told the Tagesspiegel newspaper that ethnic Arab pupils were bullying ethnic Turks, Germans and other nationalities. “School for them,” said Petra Eggebrecht, former director of the Rütli school, “is simply a place to fight for peer recognition, where young criminals become idols.” Young people are also easy targets for Islamist organisations. Outside the Rütli school, the children greeted visitors in Arabic.
When reporters went to school they were pelted with paving stones by masked youths from the schoolyard as the district’s mayor stood helplessly at the entrance of the building. An increasing problem in German schools is that Arab male students often refuse to respect the authority of women teachers. Students at the Ruetli Hauptschule were not shy about expressing their views to reporters. “The German (students) brown nose us, pay for things for us and stuff like that, so that we don’t smash in their faces.” But there are also conflicts between Arab and Turkish students, mirrored in battles between the city’s foreign-dominated youth gangs. Integration of foreign youths in Berlin is often poor. Even second and third generation children frequently do not speak fluent German and many fail to complete school - all of which leads to a high jobless rate among immigrant youths. White German families are moving out of districts like Neukoelln.
Muslim immigration has led to a spike in organized and violent crime, too. As early as 2002, Lars Hedegaard together with Dr. Daniel Pipes wrote about how Third-world immigrants - most of them Muslims from countries such as Turkey, Somalia, Pakistan, Lebanon and Iraq - constituted less than 5 percent of the population but consumed upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending. What’s worse, however, is that Muslims were only 4 percent of Denmark’s 5.4 million people but made up a majority of the country’s convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims were non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions were found in other crimes.
In 2005, it was reported that 82 percent of crimes in Copenhagen were committed by immigrants or descendants of immigrants, and the police pressed charges against second-generation immigrants five times as frequently per capita as against ethnic Danes. Doormen working in the Danish capital are now often armed with guns or clubs so as to be able to defend themselves against violent immigrant gangs. There is more violence than ever before and some immigrant gangs have even been known to seek out doormen at their private homes. Immigrant criminal gangs are much more active than previously believed, and their brutality has them surpassing biker crime gangs like the Hell’s Angels or Bandidos, the State Police said. A Norwegian researcher warned that ethnic gangs could give Norway the kind of immigrant-related organized crime that had previously been unknown in Scandinavia. Arne Johannessen from the Norwegian Police Organization warned in 2003 that the cost of crime may have been doubled during the previous decade, in part due to immigration.
In Sweden, there has been a steep rise in all kinds of crime and violence at the same time as an unprecedented amount of immigration to the country. Of course, Swedish politicians would never dream of connecting the two. However, in one of those rare cases where a Swedish newspaper has actually told the truth, Aftonbladet revealed that 9 out of the 10 most criminal ethnic groups in Sweden were Muslims, a trend known from other European countries such as France, where Muslims make up 10% of the general population, but maybe 70% of the prison population. The number of people under the age of 18 who are serving sentences in juvenile detention centres in Sweden has risen sharply over the last five years.
Not that Western European prisons will scare immigrant children too much. The relaxed regime at a prison housing some of Holland’s most dangerous criminals has caused controversy. Pictures of tattooed prisoners enjoying a “social evening” and beer embarrassed the authorities which are sensitive to claims abroad that they are soft on crime. One inmate at Esserheem serving 14 years for murder said: “We have a party every weekend in our own prison bar. We can enjoy wonderful snacks, ice cream, beers, play cards or billiards and listen to music. If the weather is warm we can play tennis.” Another prisoner spoke of “perfect” fresh food and said: “We can buy everything in the prison shop including sushi and sake.” In the Netherlands, the economic argument deployed by both leftwing Multiculturalists and free-market conservatives - that immigration revives aging populations, provides new labor resources, and generates entrepreneurial activity – “simply does not apply.” There has been no overall economic benefit to population change since unskilled guest workers were invited to the Netherlands in the early 1970s. According to Paul Scheffer, a leading critic of Multiculturalism and professor of urban sociology at Amsterdam University, up to 60% of first-generation Turkish and Moroccan populations are unemployed.
Andrew Bostom, editor of The Legacy of Jihad, quotes the observations made by Dr. Muqtedar Khan, a much-ballyhooed Muslim moderate from the U.S., after a trip to Belgium. Even Khan admitted the largesse of Belgium’s welfare state towards its Muslims: “…the welfare check was normally 70 percent to 80 percent of the salary. For those [Muslims] who were married with children, welfare provided comfortable living and with low property values, even those on welfare could actually own homes.” American expatriate writer Bruce Bawer, living in Norway, has documented in his book While Europe Slept how Oslo imams preach brazenly that Muslims should expect these welfare benefits—and feel justified in supplementing them by stealing from stores—as a form of jizya extracted from their infidel “host” societies. As Bostom points, out, “such attitudes, whatever their origins, raise this larger basic question: why does the West continue to validate the raw, imbalanced bigotry that denies non-Muslims any access to Mecca and Medina—upon pain of imprisonment, torture, and death—while Muslims demand and are granted the ability to settle, with generous accommodations, within Europe or America?”
Indeed, some of the Muslims are actively involved in supporting Jihad activities, verbally or physically. Mullah Krekar is convicted of terrorism in Jordan, he has been suspected of links to the Madrid terrorists, and the CIA claims he has been ordering bombings in Iraq. He has lived off Norwegian welfare money in Oslo for years, and reputedly gets a lot of free taxi rides from Muslim cab drivers who think he’s a great guy. Norway’s most controversial refugee has lodged a threat against the country that has hosted him and his family for the past 14 years. Mullah Krekar continues to fight deportation back to Iraq, and calls any such order “an offense” that should be punished. “I defend my rights in their court just like Western people defend their rights. I am patient like they are patient. But if my patience runs out, I will react like Orientals do.” Asked how “Orientals” react, Krekar said: “I don’t want to comment on that.” Krekar has also spoken positively about terrorist leader Osama bin Laden and the recently killed Iraqi al-Qaida leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
In Britain, the police have been investigating allegations that the four suspected London bombers from July 2005 collected more than £500,000 in benefits payments. The suspects are supposed to have used multiple aliases and addresses. One, Mr Ibrahim, is said to have had six aliases. Some are also shown to have claimed several nationalities, ages and national insurance numbers while in Britain. Investigators believe that bogus names were used to make some benefit claims. Two are also alleged to have obtained asylum using bogus passports and false names and nationalities. Mr Ibrahim, alleged to be the Hackney bus bomber, is believed to have used two dates of birth, six aliases, two national insurance numbers and two addresses. Mr Osman apparently went under five names, variously claimed that he was Eritrean or Somali, and used four addresses in southwest London. Mr Omar, 24, who is linked with the attack on a Tube train near WarrenStreet, had five aliases.
The London Times quoted a report that expressed fears that Britain was “sleepwalking its way to apartheid” due to increased ethnic segregation. The paper, which took into account the background of the four July 7 suicide bombers who attacked London, pointed to social and economic deprivation as key drivers in their conversion to terrorism, ignoring the numerous calls for violent Jihad in the Koran and the hadith. It found that the Muslim community was the most “disadvantaged” faith group in the country, with lower educational attainment and higher unemployment. The document found that the unemployment rate among Britain’s 1.6m Muslims was more than three times that of the general population and was the highest of all faith groups. About half of all Muslims were economically inactive (52%). That was higher than any other religious group.
DP111, an articulate British commentator at such websites as Jihad Watch, Little Green Footballs and Fjordman blog, points out that as Muslim families are very large, a single wage earner will find it hard to support all. They will need to supplement this by getting considerable benefits from the state. Thus at a minimum, “some 80% of the Muslim population” subsists on welfare benefits: “A considerable amount of this money to Muslims from the British taxpayer, finds its way to finance the Jihad. The same scenario must hold in all European states that have a considerable Muslim population.” “We are in the ridiculous position of sheltering and feeding a population that is hell bent on destroying us. Islam’s people, from the very outset, were nothing but a collective to gain plunder and loot at the expense of other people’s work. In the past, it was conducted by war, conquest and then pillage. Now it is conducted by immigration (invasion), begging or crime. Meanwhile Muslim nations are given huge loans (aid), which we and they know will never be repaid. Thus, from a purely economic point of view, Islam seems to be a collective of people who live by the ethos of “beg, borrow or steal.” So why do we, the capitalist countries, who do not believe in offering anyone a free lunch, subsidise the most lazy yet aggressive bunch of people on God’s planet, who are bent on subverting our democratic system? The nub is, how has it come about, that the natural progression of the most advanced civilisation on earth is towards stupidity?”
He also points out that the cost of Muslim immigration is much higher than just welfare. “One really needs to factor the loss of confidence in the markets, loss of new investment because of a fear of flying or the disenchantment with intrusive security. Then there is the increased cost of insurance on all businesses.” All this affects the competitivess of business with nations that do not have a significant Islamic presence, such as Japan, Korea and Taiwan. We may be talking of million dollars or more per Muslim individual per year. “And to top it all, we give them huge amounts of aid, welfare benefits on a grandscale, while we live in fear, and our freedoms compromised.”
Former Muslim Ali Sina claims that even in the USA, which has a smaller Muslim population and less social security benefits than Western Europe, Muslims are a huge drain on the economy: “Because about 2 million Muslims live in America and among them there are some who are terrorists, Americans are forced to expend hundreds of billions of dollars on homeland security. I have no idea how much is the actual cost. Let us be conservative and say it costs only $200 billion dollars per year. I reality it could be many times more. Does anyone have any idea? With just $200 billion dollars, every Muslim, including their children cost the taxpayers $100,000 dollars per year. This is the real “contribution” of Muslims to America Mr. President. Once you add the cost of the real damage caused in terrorist attacks, such as to planes, buildings, etc. this cost will be much higher. And here we are only talking about monetary cost. Can anyone calculate the cost that the families of the victims of terrorism pay? What is true in America is true in anywhere governments are forced to expend money to increase the security.”
Bat Ye’or in her book Eurabia - The Euro-Arab Axis describes how we are in the middle of a total transformation of Europe, which is the result of an intentional policy. In an interview with Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Bat Ye’or fears that Europe will become more and more Islamized until it becomes “a political satellite of the Arab and Muslim world.” “The European leaders have decided on an alliance with the Arab world, through which they have committed to accept the Arab and Muslim approach toward the United States and Israel. This is not only with respect to foreign policy, but also on issues engaging European society from within, such as immigration, the integration of the immigrants and the idea that Islam is part of Europe.”
Former French PM Charles de Gaulle, disappointed by the loss of the French colonies in Africa and the Middle East, as well as with France’s waning influence in the international arena, in the 1960’s decided to create a strategic alliance with the Arab and Muslim world to compete with the dominance of the United States and the Soviet Union. This alliance became the position of the European Community (pre-European Union) during the course of the 1970s, when an extensive European-Arab dialogue developed. However, this alliance, in the context of which Europe allowed the immigration of millions of Muslims to its territories and adopted an anti-Israeli and anti-American policy, will ultimately “transform Europe into a continent under the thumb of the Arab and Muslim world.”
As Bat Ye’or points out, most of the workings of Eurabia are hidden from the public view, but sometimes we can catch glimpses of it if we know what to look for. Italian Leftist PM Romano Prodi, President of the European Commission, the Politburo of the EUSSR, from 1999 to 2004, wants more cooperation with Arab countries. He talks about a free trade zone with the Arab world, but this implies the four freedoms of the EU, which includes the free movement of people. This is made clear in a document from 2003. This fact, and the implications of it, is virtually never mentioned in European media. During the Sixth Euro-Med Ministerial Conference in Brussels, 2003, it is stated that this initiative offers the EU’s neighboring partners “gradual integration into the expanded European internal market and the possibility of ultimately reaching the EU’s four fundamental freedoms: free movement of goods, services, capital and people.” Ministers were also expected to back the Commission’s proposal to set up a Euro-Mediterranean Foundation for the Dialogue of Cultures, a Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly and a reinforced European Investment Bank (EIB).
In June 2006, after his Leftist coalition government signalized that they would be much more lenient with Muslim immigration to Italy, Romano Prodi announced that “It’s time to look south and relaunch a new policy of cooperation for the Mediterranean.” He was thinking of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership, launched in 1994 in Barcelona. Prodi said he had raised the issue with Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak, and Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. The prime minister then explained that the Barcelona Process – which includes the creation of a free trade zone by 2010 - was no longer sufficient and a new different approach was needed. “The countries on the southern shores of the Mediterranean expect that from us” he added.
Muslim immigration is costing enormous sums and creating havoc across Western Europe, and EU leaders are working to give Muslims easier access to Europe – because Arabs expect this from them. Thank you for pointing this out, Mr. Prodi. And thank you for removing all doubts whether the European Union needs to be dismantled, and its treacherous and corrupt political elites removed from power.

Tolerance Cuts Both Ways....

Why must I be tolerant of Islamist ways? Have I seen any evidence that Islamists tolerate my ways? Why must I keep my mouth shut about the extreme violence and slaughter of innocents wrought by Islamists? That's an easy one: because if I don't, I'll get busted for "hate speech."
I just wish that, too, cut both ways. Unfortunately, in our politically correct society, it is only the majority to whom those rules apply, not the "oppressed" minorities. Tell me this: if the oppression here is so bad, why did the poor "oppressed" people come here? In what way is it better to live here than wherever they came from?
I mean let's get serious here! Our women drive, hold jobs, vote, get elected and aren't stoned to death for being raped. How can that be better than where women aren't treated that way? And how can it be better here when we don't put non-believers in jail? I just can't understand why someone would immigrate here! There's just far too much freedom and tolerance!
In fact, I'm not sure how we americans stand it here at all.